發新話題
打印

H.P.Browning



見MS係Hi-Power專家咁就順便考下大家...我呢支MK III有咩唔對路?

TOP

諗住無傷大雅點知又得罪咗MS添(可能今年犯太歲)...以後真係要慎言 - 唔好意思囉...

TOP

Lur口水再講過 - 見MS對Hi-Power素有研究咁就想請教吓圖�堶惕榖rowning有咩地方係錯體既(註明:呢把都唔係真嘢嚟既)- 我所知既可能啱可能唔啱,所以想睇下個錯處對一個用過無數支Browning既人嚟講明唔明顯...



唔係話唔想開新post - 不過如果已經有個現成既post講Browning既話我再開就會俾人話呃post - 左右爲難呀...

TOP

真係難服侍 - 惡啲又話小氣謙虛啲又話八婆...言歸正傳,主要係覺得退殼口個形狀有錯配:



舊底果支live既MK II - 退殼口應該係比較橢圓(oval)型既...



家陣呢支dummy - 個退殼口就比較似梯形(trapezium):剩係系舊款先見到咁樣...

可能我真係勁挑剔 - 覺得支dummy MK III配呢個退殼口唔係太自然...

TOP

引用:
原帖由 lover2006 於 25-4-2010 08:36 發表 [url=http://www.civiliangunner.com/cgf/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=628485&ptid=55034]
請問師兄你呢支 (245PT97273) 係deact或係replica ? 仲有冇机會揾到另一支 ?
呢支dummy(唔係閹鎗 - 如果係既話個grip遮唔到啲鋸痕...詳細將來講香港閹鎗時再交代)買咗差唔多成兩年幾 - 依家MK III就無影,但反而整咗支“中華民國國有”既(有人訂造所以順便造多支)...

TOP

關於退殼口既問題 - 無辦法之下唯有做自修全...好在終於揾到小小資料:



On the left is the Sport Model ejection port.  It is the classic design and continued through the Mk II-Series of Hi Powers. On the right is a 9mm Mk III ejection port and factory barrel having a cutaway to enable visually checking the chamber without retracting the slide. Notice the lower rear of the ejection port. This slightly “beefed up” area reportedly helps prevent slides from cracking at that location. The Mk III ejection port somewhat resembles that of current 1911-pattern pistols, but without the “scallop”.

大概意思係從MK III開始Browning要改良到更加切合實際需要...所以除左系chamber鎗膛位整到可以俾射手隨時睇到上咗膛未之外重要改埋退殼口個型等個slide滑架唔好太易裂(下圖紅圈個位)...

TOP

回覆 72# 的帖子

唔係...好明顯係一支 Hi-Power 換咗套 .22 Conversion Kit 啫...

TOP

發新話題