發新話題
打印

又輪到Aimpoint

又輪到Aimpoint

今次又輪到Aimpoint賣新野
不過個樣睇怕都冇咩人鐘意.....仲要賣us大洋 $699

CompM4 2 MOA Special Edition Red Dot

Compatible with every generation of Night Vision Devices (NVD).
Super ACET technology allows up to 80,000 hours (over 8 years) of day-time operation on one AA battery. <-----
1X (non-magnifying) parallax free optic.
Internal voltage regulator allows the CompM4 to be used with any AA size battery.
7 night vision compatible settings and 9 daylight settings.
Improved rotary switch will not suffer damage under normal use.
QRP2 mount has twice the clamping force of the original QRP, and the mounting knob is wider and shorter to improve operation, and lessen the chance of becoming snagged on other gear.
Mount base is "keyed" into the body of the sight to absorb recoil.
Mount base screws directly into the sight - no seprate sight ring is required.
500,000 hours of use on NVD setting.
2 MOA Dot for close combat and long distance engagement.
Matches perfectly with Aimpoint 3X magnifier
Unequalled light transmission.
Front lens opening is threaded for addition of killFlash(r) anti-reflective device.
anti-reflective device
Submersible to 150 feet.
Vertical spacer included.
Standardized as the US Army's new M68 CCO.
Improved adjustment caps are easier to remove, and are protected against impact.
Can be used with a carry handle adaptor for use on all M16 rifles.

[ 本帖最後由 felixcat 於 13-3-2007 00:58 編輯 ]

TOP

得aa 電用唔係d 咩
Eotech 552 都用左好耐, aimpoint唔夠eotech 好用

TOP

引用:
原帖由 peacemaker 於 13-3-2007 01:11 發表
得aa 電用唔係d 咩
Eotech 552 都用左好耐, aimpoint唔夠eotech 好用
我意思係1粒AA用80,000小時喎

TOP

電未用光,啲電發晒毛。
先撩者賤,打死無怨。

TOP

引用:
原帖由 felixcat 於 13-3-2007 01:15 發表



我意思係1粒AA用80,000小時喎
你買咗?
先撩者賤,打死無怨。

TOP

引用:
原帖由 AJM 於 13-3-2007 01:38 發表
電未用光,啲電發晒毛。
睇怕都係

TOP

引用:
原帖由 felixcat 於 13-3-2007 01:47 發表



睇怕都係
It is marketing tactics.
先撩者賤,打死無怨。

TOP

引用:
原帖由 AJM 於 13-3-2007 01:38 發表




你買咗?
冇呀,只係見到有得賣
..........個樣真係冇咩興趣

[ 本帖最後由 felixcat 於 13-3-2007 01:55 編輯 ]

TOP

引用:
原帖由 felixcat 於 13-3-2007 01:53 發表



冇呀,只係見到有得賣
..........個樣真係冇咩興趣
I prefer EO-Tech HWS. I am using Aimpoint because I am a SDU fans.
先撩者賤,打死無怨。

TOP

引用:
原帖由 AJM 於 13-3-2007 01:56 發表




I prefer EO-Tech HWS. I am using Aimpoint because I am a SDU fans.
我都覺得eotech係好d.

冇法啦SDU用Aimpoint

TOP

電位好長

TOP

引用:
原帖由 felixcat 於 13-3-2007 02:08 發表



我都覺得eotech係好d.

冇法啦SDU用Aimpoint
講瞄準速度一定EO-Tech HWS會比較好同快啲。
先撩者賤,打死無怨。

TOP

發新話題